If you live in a house built before WWII, chances are it came with some sort of ornamental detailing that ‘alludes’ to other eras in the history of buildings. By ‘alludes’, I mean that the detailing refers to, recalls or echoes something that was common in prior times. Sometimes these details mimic groupings of features from a specific period, but more often, as with bungalows, they are an eclectic mix drawn from various times and places that the designer felt would help give a convincing look to the building. While such details may seem no more than arbitrary choices, how they work together with the form of your house is what gives it distinctive character.
Playful or serious, simple or grand, added-on or integral to structure, ornament that alludes to prior periods abounds on and inside older homes. Take those columns holding up the verandah roof in the photo above – they might be turned wood in proportions reminiscent of the sleek Tuscan pillars of Roman antiquity, themselves alluding to the stone pillars found at ancient Greek temples.
Or perhaps they’re solid but stylishly chamfered posts that distantly recall the art of timber-frame carpentry.
![]() |
| A sleeping porch with scroll-sawn balusters alludes to a Swiss chalet |
![]() |
| These sawn balusters refer to the design of a classic table leg, upside-down |
The verandah’s railings might have delicate scroll-sawn balusters that refer indirectly to an elegant table leg (sitting upside down, photo above), or the roof over the verandah might be slightly lifted at the peak and tips, in a vaguely oriental manner (photo below).
Or, its shingles may be rolled over the edges of the roof, distantly recalling the look of a thatch-roofed cottage (photo below).
Or, if by chance it's Craftsman-influenced, it may come with knee-braces, an allusion to post-and-beam carpentry (photo below).
All of these references are to things that worked in their time, that the eye liked generally, and that felt as if they belonged where they were placed. Architects chose and assembled them in order to impart a distinct character to individual buildings, in an era when how a house looked to the world mattered more than it does today.
Some buildings come with so many allusions that the eye sees only a jumble that lacks integration (a criticism levelled at Victorian-era buildings by modernist architects, with some reason). Other houses, like those of the bungalow era, are more chaste in their overall effect because their designers governed their choices with greater restraint (even though those choices could sometimes be wildly eclectic).
Craftsman-style houses were consciously designed to eliminate excessive detailing, preferring instead a focus on proportions, structural expression, and the drawing-out of the effects of properties inherent in the finishing materials (like the wooden shingles alternated artfully below in a refurbished Vancouver home).
Often designers were indirect in their use of allusion, burying their choices at several removes from any literal interpretation. A distant original feature could serve to inspire a novel interpretation, without any attempt at literal replication.
Or, if designing a building for their own use, they deploy the allusions so indirectly that perhaps only they actually realize they exist.
And of course modernist architecture believes it doesn’t allude to anything but its creator's intentions, making it entirely pure and self-referential, by which move it hopes to avoid the conundrum of being derivative.
The Hubert Savage bungalow comes with a variety of allusions added to its distinctly California-influenced design (the bungalow form itself is laden with allusions to its origins in Bengal, India and its subsequent evolution as colonial architecture). As befits a design developed in 1913 Victoria – at that point a very English sort of place – this scheme refers overtly to Tudor-era buildings, as shown by its cross-gabled façade and the decorative boards in the gable ends. A combination of boards and plaster panels in the gables hints at the wooden half-timbers and wattle-and-daub infill of Tudor-era walls, whose distinctive appearance still characterizes living buildings from the epoch. But here they just hint abstractly without attempting replication.
Savage sprinkled Tudor references throughout his bungalow, as in the delicate arches above inset shelves built into the kitchen, dining room, and one bedroom's walls (photo below). This distinctive form of arch, albeit choose-able on aesthetic grounds alone, suggests a desire to seek continuity with the English cultural past.
But Savage employed it as a motif to enrich the built-in décor of a then-modern house, and not structurally as it would have been in Tudor times. This style of arch is unique in that its crown is flattened, similar to a Persian or Islamic arch from which it may have been derived. It contrasts strongly with the pointed Gothic arches common in its day.
Other Tudor references common to many bungalows are the boxed beams in the living and dining room ceilings, recalling the exposed beams of actual Tudor ceilings, and the wood-panelled wainscots that give a feeling of built-in furniture to the walls. Designers utilized these details not because they wanted to mimic Tudor times, but rather because they found them effective for the appearance and furnishing of their principal rooms.
Savage’s bungalow also comes with an array of leaded glass windows, in rectangular, diamond-paned and even a honey-combed (hexagonal) pattern, which is consistent with the Tudor enthusiasm for these small-paned, multi-faceted windows.
Tudor allusions were widespread in Victoria houses of the day, a trend reinforced by style-defining architects like Samuel Maclure, who deftly used them to render buildings expressing a comforting continuity with an apparently familiar past. Yet even in grander houses built for the very wealthy, these allusions were never an attempt at literal replication, but rather a way of symbolizing continuity while gaining a familiar look and feeling for these living spaces. Maclure’s expressive use of Tudor detailing produced striking buildings that remain convincing works of art even now.
Not all of the Savage bungalow’s allusions are to Tudor. Nor are they all manifest or indeed obvious, some being masked and inviting speculation. One that I recognized some years after moving in is the ‘face’ that’s clearly visible in the design of our brick fireplace. Once you make out this unusual feature, it has obviously been placed there intentionally, but typically it passes unnoticed because the eye simply doesn’t resolve the pattern in the brickwork. I used the room for years before mine picked it out against the background, but when I finally perceived it, it was obvious. Heritage building consultant Stuart Stark, on the other hand, picked it up immediately, with his trained, detective-like eye.
But just what does this face allude to? There I’m afraid I’m going on hunches alone, simply because it’s not a literal reference. One possibility is that it’s simply anthropomorphic, which is an ungainly term that stands for the act of incorporating human features into a building. This choice is basically a form of animism, whereby humans project a living spirit onto natural forces or animals, except that here it’s the human face rendered into the inanimate. But I don’t really think that this is likely, as there are no other indications in the building that I can detect.
Another line of speculation might interpret it based on the primacy of the fireplace in bungalow ideology and the central role it plays in the room where much of family life unfolds. Control of fire for cooking and heating is at the core of human cultural evolution and is celebrated in all familial life in every settled community (until lately, at least).
Fireplace and hearth remain potent symbols of our mastery of the elements and of the sense of domestic haven that this affords (one which is thought to have been under our control since Neanderthal times, so for 400,000 years). In Greek antiquity (which formed the crucible of western civilization) the hearth itself symbolized both family and domesticity, and was important enough to have its own Goddess, called Hestia, who oversaw the sacred place where fire was kept.
Hestia was among the primary gods of ancient Greece, venerated in temples where virgins apparently kept the sacred flame. She was also the primary goddess of domestic life, “the giver of all domestic happiness and blessings” and deemed present in every individual dwelling. The bungalow’s prioritization of family life in a room anchored by a focal fireplace expresses continuity with these ancient domestic ways. So my hunch is simply that the face worked into the fireplace bricks is an indirect reference to an ancient hearth goddess who inspirits all individual homes – a remote pagan allusion in a modern Anglican household. The thought that this face distantly refers to Hestia is reinforced by the fact that Hubert Savage was an architect building a hearth-centred home for his own family, and that Hestia is also credited in lore with having taught men how to build houses.
I feel more certain of the meaning of another deeply buried allusion I believe I’ve unearthed, in the form of a barrel-vaulted back porch that Savage cleverly tucked in under a lifted roof extension. Designed as a summer tea room (as shown on plan) a British variant of the open sleeping porches often found in American bungalows in Southern California, this tiny room serves many purposes integral to the home’s operation (back entry, hallway, utility hub, cooling cupboard, garden room, and more.) It can only work because of the barrel-vaulted ceiling, scooping out just enough height to enable the room to be functional.
I was attracted to the unusual curve of that ceiling from the moment I laid eyes on it (it gives a snug and cozy feeling to the room) yet I had no inkling that it might be an allusion until years after. It was while perusing Anthony King’s engaging history of the bungalow as the first global house type that I had my ‘aha’ moment (The Bungalow: The Production of a Global Culture). King relates the early twentieth century linkage of the bungalow with things bohemian and artistic in England, an association that arose from their popularity with theatre types who escaped to seaside locations where these recreational homes served as getaways. Resorts catering to a bohemian crowd developed a bit of a racy reputation as they enabled individual freedoms and looser styles of living, making them a little controversial in stuffy old England, but emblematic of freedom among those more concerned to be hip. One community in particular, a resort known as Shoreham by Sea, had clusters of these permissive bungalows in an area that came to be known as Bungalow Town.
I was fascinated to learn that it was common at the time to use surplus rail-passenger cars as ready-made bungalows – often two or three of these would be attached and turned into serviceable recreational housing. (Railways were a huge invention in industrial England and fifty years after they first flourished, there were a great many surplus rail passenger cars that were cheap to acquire). Pictures in Anthony King’s book illustrate the distinctive curve and banding pattern to the ceilings of these metal cars, some of which continue to serve as houses to this day. The curved ceiling in our back room is highly reminiscent of an early railway passenger car. I can’t help but think that Hubert Savage, a newly expatriate British architect, building his own home bungalow-style near the seaside, took the opportunity to bury an allusion to the use of these ready-made rail-car bungalows in his native England. And that, by extension, he thus reinforced an association of his modern bungalow with the ‘free and easy living’ that was being marketed as part and parcel of the bungalow-lifestyle across North America.
Like most allusions in architecture, this is no more than an indirect reference to something past and unlikely to be seen as such by those who inhabit or use the building over time. Nor is it necessary to see it in order to use and enjoy the building. Yet these details comprise the building’s living character and fabric, and their particular combinations help create its distinct personality. I have to admit to a certain satisfaction in being able to recognize especially the buried references – it’s rather like being let in on a private entertainment!
Books For Looks:
The Bungalow: The Production of a Global Culture, A. D. King, 1995

























